It was also the best policy for us, shielding us from unnecessary risks and protecting us from unnecessary overtime.
I did feel it when I was stuck in the situation where I had to update the whole document over and over again because updates kept coming in and I needed to keep the document ready for intermediate submission.
I had a very embarrassing Steerco this week, with a lot of learnings.
1.What happened?
I used a different source of data for an analysis, rather than the invoice data which was supposed to be the source data for everything.
That resulted in a baseline 6 time higher.
The client captured that in the SteerCo, and no proper explanation came through and it turned into a very embarrassing moment.
The cost was high.
If I had just used the invoice data, I would have saved time in doing the analysis, saved the embarrassment as well as the time I had to put in after the SteerCo to make amends.
The time alone I could have saved would be easily one day of work.
Let along the impact of this embarrassing moment on our credibility and other aspects on the higher lever, such as the possibility of the next phase commitment, as well as the time leadership had to put in to manage damage.
I was so vested in the task that I wanted to get every possible thing that can make it better, so that people would keep seeing the good work I had been doing.
So instead of the using the invoice data as baseline, as every one else was using and as I was using for any other task, I picked another source, which required much more work but did not really have any strong rationale to be a better source than the invoice data, apart from that it would make the analysis look prettier.
And I did not catch the hidden duplication in the data and thus the baseline was 6 times higher.
And then I was hit by the embarrassing moment and had to deal with the consequence.
This is a perfect example why maintaining professionalism all the time is so critical, especially in time-critical tasks.